Monday, May 5, 2014

FITs, RPS and Net-Metering

Feed-in-Tariff (FIT), Net Metering and Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) are all policy designs to accelerate the investments in renewable energy. Although they all have same objective goals, there are significant differences in terms of targeted groups, economic incentives and effectiveness of the programs.

FIT’s are generally fixed term contractual agreement that guarantees a fixed price for per unit of electricity produced from a qualified renewable source. The contract also guarantees grid access for the producer. There are different variations in FIT design based on types of generation source, size of the plant, geographic location. FITs were first introduced in the US in the 1978 under PURPA, they are now much more popular in European countries especially Germany and Spain. 

RPS is a requirement generally on the retail electric suppliers to meet a certain amount to their load through eligible sources of renewable energy. RPS usually do not provide direct subsidy to the renewable generation but the policy creates a secondary renewable energy credit (REC) market where the retail utilities can trade the RECs to meet their mandatory requirement. The high demand for RECs provides incentive to produces to invest in renewable energy. RPS programs are popular in the US where around 30 states have some form of their RPS with different variations on structure, enforcement, size and application.

Net metering is similar to FIT programs but instead of guaranteed tariff, it only allows the meter to “run backwards” when you produce electricity thus offsetting the electric bill. There is not much incentive to generate more than current use since you do not paid for the extra generation. Also, since the bill is net metered, the price paid for renewable generation is same as the current retail price which do not provide enough economic incentive for producers to invest. The physical and geographical location of your property is a barrier for installing renewable generation for net metering.

Among the three programs, FIT’s is much stronger policy to promote renewable energy. The long term guaranteed pricing offered by the FITs shelters the investors from the market volatility and risks involved in renewable energy generation. Although RPS and REC trading is market based mechanism allowing flexibility for utilities, the volatility in the price of RECs may inhibit investors in financing renewable projects. FITs provide simplest and transparent policy that provides stable conditions for growth in renewable energy generation. Properly designed FIT with a balanced cost-based tariff can be the best way to increase investments in renewable energy.


Renewable energy sources offer numerous benefits to our environment, energy security and economic benefits. FITs, RPS and net-metering essentially try to include the positive externalities that the renewables offer in its market price. It is not required than that policymakers have to choose between the three programs. Well designed policy in an informed population can include all of the policies to expedite renewable energy transition. However the policies can only take you so much if the public is not well informed and do have willpower to move forward.