Saturday, March 22, 2014

Settlement Patterns, Energy, and the Environment (Vermont Case Study)

By Anonymous Guest Writer (VLS student)
Vermont’s distributed settlement pattern significantly impacts energy consumption and the environment by requiring a significant amount of travel. Vermonters consume 20% more gasoline per capita than the national average and transportation is Vermont’s largest source of greenhouse gas emissions.[1] [2] In order to meet its statutory greenhouse gas reduction goals and reduce energy use in the transportation sector, Vermont should strengthen its land use laws and planning requirements to prevent further sprawl and channel new development to downtown areas.[3] In the process, Vermont can reduce the security and economic risks associated with petroleum dependence while preserving its rural character and creating vibrant, walkable communities.
Current state law does little to slow single-family residential development in the countryside. Act 250 limits individuals from dividing land into six or more lots within five years in towns without zoning bylaws, or ten or more lots within a five-mile radius within five years, without a permit.[4] This, however, is weak as it neither corrects the market incentive to subdivide nor provides a real constraint to doing so on a small-scale or long-term basis, the cumulative impacts of which are meaningful. Additionally, no state permit is required for residential development unless it involves ten or more units within five years or the site is above 2500 feet in elevation.[5] Thus, restrictions on single-family residential development largely rely on municipal subdivision and zoning ordinances, which many towns do not have (including Royalton).
Vermont enacted Act 183 in 2006 which allows municipalities to designate defined areas for development known as “growth centers.” The law streamlines Act 250 permitting within growth centers and targets state infrastructure funding and spending within them.[6] While this legislation is a step toward encouraging smart growth, it does little to control the continued subdivision and homebuilding in the countryside. Moreover, state-level planning is “essentially limited to reactive review of local initiatives.” [7]
Vermont’s laws should be strengthened in several ways to reduce sprawl and improve smart growth planning. Firstly, the legislature should provide for coordinated state-wide land use planning, which can be accomplished by creating a state-level planning group and providing it with adequate resources. The function of this group would be to create a state-wide land use plan that binds the regional plans together and provides policy guidance on the best methods for reenergizing Vermont town centers and containing growth.[8] This group should measure and periodically report on the proportion of growth that is occurring within growth centers and should be authorized to enact appropriate policies that are required to meet long-term targets set by the legislature.
Secondly, the State of Vermont should require that all towns create growth zone boundaries and enact a meaningful tax on land that is subdivided outside designated growth boundaries. This would serve to counteract the financial incentive to subdivide land with the proceeds distributed to towns and regional planning commissions to strengthen planning and incentivize compact development. Permitting requirements should be phased in for all new construction of residences outside the growth zones to ensure building occurs at a scale and in locations that preserve the ability to conduct agriculture and maintain forest habitat. A tax on construction of new residences outside the growth zone could be levied proportionally to the distance from the growth zone with proceeds earmarked to support municipal infrastructure projects within the growth zone.
Thirdly, planning inside designated growth boundaries must be smart so that available land is not used inefficiently and depleted. Growth area development should be safe, walkable, and an attractive place to reside with options for car-sharing or public transportation. It is possible to build an auto-dependent, suburban layout within growth centers (as pictured in appendix), which must be avoided. To accomplish this, Vermont’s law should require that towns conduct smart growth planning within their growth zones and adequate resources should be made available to them to do so, including the guidance of the state and regional planning commissions. Permitting requirements should be strengthened to require permitting of new stand-alone residential structures within the growth area to ensure they are in conformance with the town plan and principles of smart growth.
Fourthly, living in town should be made more affordable so that it presents a financially attractive alternative that is accessible. This can be accomplished through good planning that removes the need to own a vehicle and provides a diverse housing stock. Vermont can enact laws that direct funding for its rental assistance programs to growth areas and require that major employers establish themselves within growth areas.
It is important to get land use right. Once land has been subdivided, it is difficult to piece it back together, and once land has been developed, it is difficult to undo without significant economic costs. Current law does little to control sprawling residential development in the countryside, the continuation of which has the effect of imposing an energy-intensive travel requirement that works against Vermont’s goal to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. By strengthening planning requirements, imposing taxes and offering incentives that strategically induce market behavior to align more closely with societal objectives as enumerated in town, regional, and state plans, and strengthening the requirements of Act 250, Vermont can channel future growth strategically to create vibrant downtowns that reduce energy requirements and environmental impact.



[1] Energy Consumption by Transportation Fuel in Vermont, U.S. Department of Energy EERE. Available at: http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/states/transportation.cfm/state=VT
[2] Vermont Greenhouse Gas  Emissions Inventory Update 1990 – 2009. April, 2013. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Air Pollution Control Division
[3] Vermont’s GHG Reduction Goals are enumerated in 10 VSA § 578
[4] 10 VSA § 6001-19
[5] 10 VSA § 6001-3A
[6] 24 V.S.A. § 2793c
[7] Jack Kraichnan, Vermont’s Act 183: Smart Growth Takes Root in the Green Mountain State. P. 605. Vermont Law Review. Available at http://lawreview.vermontlaw.edu/files/2012/02/kraichnan.pdf.
[8] Ibid.